December 2016
 << <Oct 2017> >>


Who's Online?

Member: 0
Visitors: 2

rss Syndication

Posts sent on: 2001-01-01


The plantar fascia is a thick, broad ligament that runs along the bottom of the foot from the heel to the base of the toes. This fascia maintains the structure of the arch. According to MedlinePlus, the plantar fascia can become inflamed from injury or overuse, causing a dull ache on the sole of the foot. A heel spur can form on the heel bone, or calcaneus, where the plantar fascia attaches, causing pain along the sole. Conditions that predispose you to plantar fasciitis or formation of a heel spur include obesity, long-distance running and a rigid flat or high-arched foot. You Might Also Like Metatarsalgia and Arthritis

Ingrown Toenails. Ingrown toenails can occur in any toe but are most common in the big toes. They usually develop when tight fitting or narrow shoes put too much pressure on the toenail and force the nail to grow down into the flesh of the toe. Incorrect toenail trimming can also contribute to the risk of developing an ingrown toenail ( see How Is Foot Pain Prevented, in this report) Fungal infections, injuries, abnormalities in the structure of the foot, and repeated pressure to the toenail from high impact aerobic exercise can also produce ingrown toenails.

Treatment for Calluses. Calluses protect the feet and often do not need to be treated, but if a callus causes pain, several treatments are effective. Sanding the callus with a pumice stone after bathing is very helpful. Soft cushions placed in the heel of the shoes or under the ball of the foot can help relieve pain. Specially fitted shoe inserts are also helpful. Liquid solutions or medicated pads treated with salicylic acid, the same chemical used to treat corns, are also effective in removing calluses (For precautions, see Corns, above ). If calluses are well-developed and cause pain, professional trimming is recommended.foot pain icd 9

When the reason for foot pain is not known, it is important to let your doctor check for any underlying conditions you may have. Osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis can both cause foot pain. Diabetes can also cause you to experience foot pain. When this occurs, it is referred to Heel Spurs as diabetic neuropathy. This is a nerve pain that is intense and can cause your toes to cramp. For a diabetic, good blood glucose control can help prevent the pain. Once your doctor determines the cause of your foot pain, treating the pain will be easier. Prevention and Treatment

Healthy, balanced diet and regular exercises can help avoid pain on the top of the foot or at the bottom of the foot. A nutrients rich diet ensures proper functioning of body systems and bodily organs. You should also check whether you are wearing properly fitting shoes. Mild foot pain can be cured with oil massage, application of ice and heat and moderate exercises under the guidance of an expert. You can even apply balm or an ointment. Avoid exposing the foot to extreme cold. Try to keep it warm by wearing socks. Sometimes, providing sufficient rest to the foot helps get rid of the pain and discomfort.

Sport activities contribute significantly to side of foot pain with athletics and gymnastics being top of the list. There are two distinctive fractures than can cause intense side of foot pain and these are March fractures and Stress fractures. March fractures result from undertaking vigorous physical activity without the correct warm up procedures or when a person undertakes extreme exercise outside of their normal everyday activities. Stress fractures normally result from repetitive and excessive strain over a given period of time. From the onset of any side of foot pain , first treatment is to simply remember RICE. This stands for rest, ice, compression and elevation.

In today's world where fashion rules, lack of willingness to buy more comfortable shoes can lead to disaster. However, with the use of insoles for high heel shoes, ball of foot pain can be relieved with consistent wear. It is advisable to choose shoes that have a heel with a less than 2" heel and with a wider-profile heel such as a wedge to avoid future ball of foot pain. Be sure to elongate foot muscles with a stretch and have them massaged to encourage optimal blood flow to the feet.
Admin · 2972 views · Leave a comment


heel lift insoles for leg length discrepancyDo you often want to be taller and are not happy with the height that you are? You may have tried a lot of different products and techniques to try to grow taller and if you are ready to try something that really works, you can find shoe insoles that will make you look inches taller, all without having to take any kind of supplement or other procedure that is designed to make you look taller. The insoles that you can try are called the Levitator shoe lifts, and they are made to easily fit into your shoes without being able to notice that they are there.

The Yoko / Kimi shoe pads are designed to have raised tabs at specific places that, with each step you take, will exert pressure on certain acupressure points to stimulate the production of human growth hormone (HGH for short), which is a hormone that is believed to be responsible for height increase. The more you wear them, the more effective they tend to be. The downside of these products is that while some people have vouched for their effectiveness in increasing height, walking with these inserts for too long can cause blisters or bleeding on your soles. Insoles To Increase Height.

If you are not satisfied with the ready-made insoles, you can also use custom-made insoles that fit in your shoes perfectly. You can also check out Lynco Aetrex orthotics for runners and athletes. These are one of the best shoe inserts for plantar fasciitis. Sole Ultra heat moldable footbeds are also one of the most effective shoe inserts for an inflamed plantar fascia. Other manufacturers providing good quality shoe inserts include Superfeet, Spenco, Birkenstock and Sorbothane also manufacture insoles. Those who have flat feet will surely benefit by using PowerStep insoles. If you are not able to decide which one is best, you can always consult a podiatrist.

One way to help prevent heel spurs is stretch the foot and calf before strenuous exercise. By stretching these tissues, you create more flexibility which lessens the likelihood of plantar fascia stress. It is also essential to wear shoes that fit properly and provide ample arch support and cushioning to the foot. Arch support insoles are a smart addition to any shoe to help eliminate any abnormal stress on the Plantar Fascia, which could lead to heel bone spurs. Being mindful of our feet is a very important step in staying healthy. Healthy feet are a critical component to our long-term health.

Most people experience pain on the heel when they wake up in the morning and begin to walk. There is less pain and stiffness after a while; however, the pain may increase during the day. The pain can occur when you stand or sit for a long time too. The illness is caused when there is strain on the ligament that provides support to the arch. Tiny ligament tears are caused when there are repeated strains resulting in swelling and pain. Continued stretching of the plantar fascia can result in heel spur which is a bone-like development on the heel. Flat feet or high arches can be a cause.

Heel pain in children is mostly caused due to Sever's disease. It can also be caused due to some other health conditions. Usually, young children in the age group of 10 to 14 suffer from heel pain. Boys tend to get heel pain more frequently as compared to girls. The pain is felt grow taller naturally at the back of the heel and sometimes, at the bottom of the heel as well. The pain may not be constant and it comes and goes. It can affect both the legs or just one leg may also get affected. Normally, the healing time is two weeks though it may recur after a period of time.

It is strongly suggested that the person struggling with plantar fasciitis need to take appropriate rest till the pain sensation subside and correct medical treatment can be provided. While in the first period, the pain due to the condition could be really distressing and therefore, though the rest might be a challenge, it becomes essential. Tape might even be put on the area to give it appropriate support. Certain prescription drugs and foot rests can be found in the marketplace allowing the plantar fascia muscle tissues to stretch out. These may be used within hours in order to decrease painful sensation.

These special insoles are used near the standard in built arch support of the shoes Beforehand you will take away the padding inside the shoes after which you'll be able to embed the insoles so as the individual can't sense any uncomfortableness from extra support. They are in contrast to the normal inserts due to the fact that they provides you with quick reduction from your painfulness that you're experiencing after the insoles becomes naturally worn in. The actual adjustment may possibly require a two days' time but you would not dismiss using these types of shoe inserts ever again.

By using this type of material, the weight of the body is resisted and the insert will retain its stiffness, and therefore it's ability to alter the foot structure. Comfort is maintained despite its hardness because the insert is an exact match to the individual foot. Plastizote coverings are added to the inserts to reduce pressure and friction even further. They are commonly used in many individuals with and without diabetes to support excessive foot flattening, reduce arch ligament injury (plantar fasciitis), and treat serious foot tendonitis and spraining. For diabetics with significant foot structural abnormalities, prescription orthotics are the preferred way of protecting the foot.

If you have shoe insoles, you probably have figured out that you need to replace them after some time. Replacing your orthotics is important for optimum comfort and protection. There are different indications that will tell you when you have to replace your orthotic insoles or inserts. One is when they don’t fit properly. Insoles that don’t fit well are inefficient and can cause discomfort. If your orthotics are causing you discomfort, you have to return them. If they are already old, they are probably worn out. See if the plastic shell has shown deterioration.
Admin · 19838 views · Leave a comment


heel lift inserts walmartIf you have tried other kinds of insoles or lifts before but have found that they are noticeable and not comfortable to wear, the Levitator shoe lifts are something that you should try if you want to increase your height. They are designed to easily fit into your shoes and provide you with comfort while making you look taller. You can increase your height easily when you find the right kind of insoles to use. You can buy the insoles and shoe lifts online and have them ready to use.

Shoe lifts or heel lifts can be used to address various problems. The most common use is to adjust for leg length discrepancies. Leg length differences are often the cause of pain in the back, knees, hips, legs or feet. If one leg is longer than the other, it can carry more weight and take more force upon impact. On the other hand shorter leg can strike the floor differently the problems are never-ending. Shoe lifts that reduce the strain on the low back during walking or those that facilitate in the improvement of posture are good buy.

If you are not satisfied with the ready-made insoles, you can also use custom-made insoles that fit in your shoes perfectly. You can also check out Lynco Aetrex orthotics for runners and athletes. These are one of the best shoe inserts for plantar fasciitis. Sole Ultra heat moldable footbeds are also one of the most effective shoe inserts for an inflamed plantar fascia. Other manufacturers providing good quality shoe inserts include Superfeet, Spenco, Birkenstock and Sorbothane also manufacture insoles. Those who have flat feet will surely benefit by using PowerStep insoles. If you are not able to decide which one is best, you can always consult a podiatrist.

The next crucial thing to do is immediately put on a comfortable pair of shoes and orthotic shoe insoles. This will help to cushion and support the bottom of your foot and help to keep it from more injury. If you utilize the proper plantar fasciitis stretching exercises and arch support inserts, you will see a great improvement in your heel pain. You should really pay attention to your body and if you are aware of foot pain, talk to a doctor as soon as possible. This will ensure that your pain does not become a more serious issue.

When searching for plantar fasciitis inserts, one of the most important things to take into account would be the comfortableness it offers. You do not want to get one that is too hard as the feet would feel very not comfortable. On the other hand, you do not want one that is too soft as it might not provide you with the support that you need. Getting one that is moderately firm is a better solution to use. With the internet, it's very simple to find testimonials on each and every orthotic that may help you choose the perfect one to get.

When you find that your child is experiencing heel pain quite frequently, then you should consult a physiotherapist for proper diagnosis of the problem. It is usually identified with the help of physical examination of the leg of the child and x-ray of the foot. Depending on the condition of shoe lift the heel, the physiotherapist will ascertain how much activities is permissible for your child and what amount of rest is required. In case the pain is unbearable for the child, painkillers are prescribed. Physical therapy and stretching exercises are also beneficial in pain management.

KURU shoes are specially formed with custom orthotics that are proven to address many foot conditions to help you rediscover healthy movement. Through our innovative KURU SOLE technology, our built in orthotics provide a custom fit for your own unique foot. Medical-grade, heat responsive foams built into the footbed adapt to the natural shape of the foot when you move for natural comfort, and outstanding performance. KURU shoes are durable and proven to meet your everyday needs. Lacking arch support? KURU provides some of the world’s most comfortable arch support shoes that fit your feet like a glove.

The insole is a part of the shoe on which the foot rests. Nowadays, most of the insoles are removable. Insoles in shoes can not only add to the comfort of the user, but also are used to relieve heel pain. Many different types of insoles are manufactured keeping in mind the comfort factor. These are made for specific purposes like running, exercising, walking, etc. Depending on the activity that a person is intending to do, the insoles of varying thickness and comfort levels can be used. The following article provides more information on the insoles made for common heel problems like flat feet and plantar fasciitis.

The majority of people highly recommends adopting the non-surgical tips for pain relief as they are more result giving in a friendly and comfortable environment and also gives relief for longer time. The most common non-surgical care recommended by all the physicians and researchers are physical therapy, pain killers, asteroid injections and most common cure of adapting to tailor and customized footwear that includes inserts for shoe to avoid paining feet. Foot Solutions Alexandria recently gained huge customer feedback on the latest customized footwear that includes inserts for shoe helping people to avoid the shock to their toes while walking and also provides relief from the extreme foot ache.

Footwear has become a fashion accessory these days. No wonder, the footwear companies are always on a lookout for designs that will please the customers. One must, however, not forget that style must not come before health. Some of the shoes might look very appealing, but the fashionable high-heeled or pointy shoes can put pressure on the plantar fascia. Wearing poorly-fitting shoes is one mistake that can cost you a lot later on. Those who have already been diagnosed with foot problems such as plantar fasciitis will, therefore, benefit greatly by donning plantar fasciitis shoes. These are good at absorbing shocks and also facilitate a proper arch support.
Admin · 27004 views · Leave a comment


Watchdog report offers harshest critique of NSA metadata program to date | Ars Technica
NSA leaks Surveillance watchdog concludes metadata program is illegal, "should end"Snowden, in rare interview, denies all accusations of help from MoscowNew documents: NSA provided 2-3 daily "tips" to FBI for at least 3 yearsObama lays down new limits on NSA, with more reforms to comeWorried about snooping, India won"t partner with Google for electionsView all...
In its 238-page report published on Thursday, the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB) provided the most robust and comprehensive argument against the government"s interpretation of its ability to collect bulk metadata under Section 215 of the Patriot Act.

The report gives 12 concrete recommendations that Congress and the White House should take. Some of these overlap with what President Barack Obama has said he would like to implement, but many suggestions go even further. For now, though, these proposals are just recommendations"they do nothing unless acted upon.

"The privacy board"s findings closely mirror many of the criticisms made by surveillance reform advocates. The bulk collection program was built on a murky legal foundation that raises many constitutional questions and has been proven to be an ineffective tool for collecting unique intelligence information," wrote Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) in a statement on the report. "There have now been two in-depth studies of these programs by unimpeachable government entities that have come to the same conclusion: the bulk collection program should be effectively ended. As the president announced last week, the administration and the Congress will decide the fate of this problematic program in the coming weeks, and it is my belief that reports such as those from the PCLOB and the President"s Review Group should play a major role in any reform effort."

In addition to ending the metadata program entirely over time, the Board recommended making some immediate changes to the program, including submitting the National Security Agency"s "reasonable articulable suspicion" to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) for review. In addition, as the president"s own recommendation said, there should be a "special advocate" who could argue the civil liberties perspective before the FISC. (Current hearings before the FISC are ex parte, where only one side"the government"s"is heard.)

Among other advisories, the PCLOB proposed for the first time that Congress specifically enact legislation that would allow appeals from the FISC to be heard by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review (FISCR), which could then be appealed to the Supreme Court.

The Thursday PCLOB report only addresses critiques of the Section 215 program, but it notes that a future report will address problems found in Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Amendments Act (FISA AA). Meanwhile, the report describes the rules for targeting non-Americans outside the United States. The government argues that PRISM and related spying programs targeting non-Americans outside the United States are authorized under Section 702.

The new report comes about a month after President Barack Obama"s own panel recommended, among other things, that the NSA should no longer be in charge of holding its vast collection of telephone metadata. The PCLOB, unlike the president"s Review Group on Intelligence and Communications Technologies, was created by an act of Congress in 2007 as the result of recommendations from the 911/ Commission. It will continue its watchdog authority indefinitely.

It"s relevant because we say so
The report goes into great detail explaining both the mechanics of the bulk metadata collection program and how it began. It also emphasizes that under the Section 215 program, the NSA does not collect cell-site location information (CSLI), which can be used to provide geographic information about a call.

However, the report ominously notes:

In the past, the NSA has collected a limited amount of cell site location information to test the feasibility of incorporating such information into its Section 215 program, but that information has not been used for intelligence analysis, and the government has stated that the agency does not now collect it under this program.

The PCLOB concluded, as Ars has previously, that by allowing analysis of up to "three hops," this could potentially? encompass around half the population of the United States:

If the NSA queries around 300 seed numbers a year, as it did in 2012, then based on the estimates provided earlier about the number of records produced in response to a single query, the corporate store would contain records involving over 120 million telephone numbers.

The meat of the PCLOB report concerns its legal and statutory? analysis of the Section 215 program. The group opened up by noting its belief that "this program has been operated in good faith":

However, the Board concludes that Section 215 does not provide an adequate legal basis to support this program. Because the program is not statutorily authorized, it must be ended.

Section 215 is designed to enable the FBI to acquire records that a business has in its possession, as part of an FBI investigation, when those records are relevant to the investigation. Yet the operation of the NSA"s bulk telephone records program bears almost no resemblance to that description.

First, the telephone records acquired under this program have no connection to any specific FBI investigation at the time the government obtains them. Instead, they are collected in advance to be searched later for records that do have such a connection. Second, because the records are collected in bulk"potentially encompassing all telephone calling records across the nation"they cannot be regarded as "relevant" to any FBI investigation without redefining that word in a manner that is circular, unlimited in scope, and out of step with precedent from analogous legal contexts involving the production of records. Third, instead of compelling telephone companies to turn over records already in their possession, the program operates by placing those companies under a continuing obligation to furnish newly generated calling records on a daily basis. This is an approach lacking foundation in the statute and one that is inconsistent with FISA as a whole, because it circumvents another provision that governs (and limits) the prospective collection of the same type of information. Fourth, the statute permits only the FBI to obtain items for use in its own investigations. It does not authorize the NSA to collect anything.

The PCLOB report even digs into great detail, focusing on textual analysis of a single word:

Notably, Section 215 requires that records sought be relevant to "an" authorized investigation.
Elsewhere, the statute similarly describes the records that can be obtained under its auspices as those sought "for an investigation." The use of the singular noun in these passages signals an expectation that the records are being sought for use in a specific, identified investigation. This interpretation is reinforced by the requirement that the FISA court make specific findings about the investigation for which the records are sought"that it is supported by a factual predicate, conducted according to guidelines approved by the Attorney General, and not based solely upon activities protected by the First Amendment when conducted of a U.S. person.

. . .

At its core, the approach boils down to the proposition that essentially all telephone records are relevant to essentially all international terrorism investigations. The Board does not believe that this approach comports with a fair reading of the statute.

That pesky third-party doctrine
The PCLOB also took issue with the FISC judges" conclusions, which concurred with the government"s perspective. That viewpoint says that not only is the metadata program legal, it's necessary. The report says:

At its core, the approach boils down to the proposition that essentially all telephone records are relevant to essentially all international terrorism investigations. The Board does not believe that this approach comports with a fair reading of the statute.

. . .

This rationale also is inconsistent with Section 215"s requirement that the government provide "a statement of facts" showing that there are "reasonable grounds to believe" that items sought are relevant to an investigation. Such language calls upon the government to supply a fact-bound explanation of why the particular group of records it seeks may have some bearing on one of its investigations. But because the NSA"s program depends on collecting virtually all telephone records, only two facts are cited by the government in support of its applications: that terrorists communicate by telephone, and that it is necessary to collect records in bulk to find the connections that can be uncovered by NSA analysis.

Beyond a rejection of the broad interpretation of "relevant" materials, the PCLOB also found that the Section 215 program violates the (much-maligned)? 1986-era Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) as well as the United States Constitution. That law forbids providers from passing along customer data to any government entity, unless a warrant, court order, or other legal instrument requires it. In 2008, the FISC ruled that the Section 215 program was implicitly consistent with the ECPA. The report says:

Inferring an unwritten exception to ECPA based on an "anomaly" is particularly questionable when that exception is then used to permit the NSA"s bulk collection of telephone records. As noted, the FISA court concluded that it would be irrational to prohibit the government from obtaining telephone records through Section 215, which requires a judge to agree that the records are relevant to an investigation, when the FBI can obtain those same records through a national security letter, which requires no prior judicial approval. But the FBI already widely obtains telephone records through national security letters, and the FISA court"s ruling simply permits a second agency, the NSA, to obtain all telephone records. Even if an aggressive reading of Section 215 permits that result"which we believe is not the case"it clearly is not what Congress intended to achieve when it enacted Section 215.

Like many prior privacy-minded legal analyses, the PCLOB's report argues against the government"s claim that Americans do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the numbers that they dial (the metadata). The US government has cited the "third-party doctrine," which courts have historically upheld, finding that simply dialing a number requires giving up that number to the phone company in question, and therefore it cannot possibly be private. (The case in question is Smith v. Maryland.) The Supreme Court has not revisited the third-party doctrine since the 1970s, although Justice Sonia Sotomayor has expressed possible interest in hearing newer challenges.

The government has essentially argued that because it used a pen register to access Smith"s metadata over the course of two days, and because he had no privacy interests in that data, the more modern government has the authority to collect all metadata about all Americans all the time. The report says:

In contrast, for each of the millions of telephone numbers covered by the NSA"s Section 215 program, the agency obtains a record of all incoming and outgoing calls, the duration of those calls, and the precise time of day when they occurred. When the agency targets a telephone number for analysis, the same information [is obtained] for every telephone number with which the original number has had contact, and every telephone number in contact with any of those numbers. And, subject to regular program renewal by the FISA court, it collects these records every day, without interruption, and retains them for a five year time period. Sweeping up this vast swath of information, the government has explained, allows the NSA to use "sophisticated analytic tools" to "discover connections between individuals" and reveal "chains of communication""a broader power than simply learning the telephone numbers dialed by a single targeted individual.

Privacy lawyers have roundly lauded the new PCLOB report and hope that it puts newfound pressure on the Obama Administration.

"In last week"s speech, billed as a major policy address on surveillance, the president ignored the vast majority of his own review committee"s recommendations, especially those on the structure, activities, and mission of the NSA," Fred Cate, a law professor at Indiana University, told Ars in a statement.

"He ignored entirely the fundamental issue provoked by Snowden"s disclosures of not just numerous surveillance programs, but a culture and approach of vacuuming up all available data, often in overlapping programs, without a clear mission or legal authorization or clear understanding of the competing interests. He didn"t even mention the emerging legal debate over the legality of bulk data collection or the dispute between two federal courts that reached opposite conclusions on that question in the past month."

Similarly, the Center for Democracy and Technology believes that Obama and Congress need to do more to rein in the NSA.

"The PCLOB report demonstrates that the president did not go far enough in his reform recommendations last week," said Nuala O"Connor, the group"s director, in a statement sent to Ars. "Rather than shifting bulk collection to another authority or narrowing the number of records accessed with each NSA query, the president should follow the recommendations of his handpicked Review Group and the independent PCLOB, and he should support legislation intended to end the program, like the USA Freedom Act."

Admin · 1679 views · Leave a comment


State of emergency begins in Thailand - Houston Chronicle
BANGKOK (AP) -- Protesters vying to overthrow Thailand's government stayed on the streets Wednesday despite the start of a state of emergency in the capital that was imposed to cope with the nation's increasingly violent political crisis.
The emergency decree announced late Tuesday allows authorities to ban public gatherings, impose curfews and censor local news reports for the next 60 days.
But the government said it would not crack down on demonstrators who have seized several patches of Bangkok, and life in the city continued as normal with tourist sites unaffected and no major deployment of extra security forces.
The state of emergency follows increasing attacks at protest sites for which the government and the protesters blame each other. Grenade attacks on Friday and Sunday killed one man and wounded more than 60 people alone, bringing the casualty toll since November to at least nine dead and 554 hurt.
The unrest has cast doubt over whether Feb. 2 elections, which Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra called to quell the crisis, will be held.
On Wednesday, the Election Commission was expected to request the Constitutional Court to issue a ruling on how and whether the ballot can be delayed.
Charupong Ruangsuwan, caretaker Interior Minister, told The Associated Press the vote should go ahead and the Election Commission should not use the state of emergency as an excuse to postpone the poll.
"They can use any excuses all they want, but their duty is to hold the election," he said. "They may accuse the government of causing problems, but the government doesn't have any problems."
The emergency decree appeared to embolden the demonstrators. Protest leader Suthep Thaugsuban vowed late Tuesday to continue demonstrating and questioned whether the declaration was justified, saying the protesters had been peaceful.
"Come and get us!" he cried.
"Whatever they warn us not to do, we will do," he declared. "We will march on the routes they ban. ... If they order us not to rally, we will be here indefinitely."
The protesters have been demanding Yingluck's resignation to make way for an appointed government to implement reforms to fight corruption, which they say must be implemented before any vote. The opposition Democrat Party, closely aligned with the protesters, is boycotting the polls.
The protesters charge that Yingluck's government is carrying on the practices of Thaksin Shinawatra, her billionaire brother who was prime minister from 2001 to 2006, by using the family fortune and state funds to influence voters and cement its power. Thaksin was ousted by a military coup in 2006 after protests accused him of corruption and abuse of power. He fled into exile in 2008 to avoid a two-year prison sentence for a conflict of interest conviction.
Deputy Prime Minister Surapong Tovichakchaikul said Suthep's protesters "have constantly violated the law, especially in closing down government offices and banks and harassment against civil servants to prevent them from working."
He added the demonstrators "had gone overboard, and attacks were carried out by ill-intentioned people, causing people to be injured and killed, affecting the country's stability."
Deputy army spokesman Col. Winthai Suvaree said the military would support the government and supply forces as needed.
In Washington, the State Department said the U.S. strongly condemns increasing violence, and urged Thai authorities to investigate the attacks and bring those responsible to justice.
"It is unfortunate that the situation has gotten to the point where the government felt it was necessary to invoke an emergency decree. We urge all sides to exercise restraint," spokeswoman Marie Harf said Tuesday.
Associated Press writers Jinda Wedel in Bangkok and Matthew Pennington in Washington contributed to this report.
Admin · 197 views · Leave a comment

Previous page  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next page